Kelly,

I've intentionally tried to stay out of the conversation as I work for a vendor in this space, BUT....

<vendor>

We can help. Feel free to contact me off list to discuss. bmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

</vendor>

Brian May
Director
Pre-Sales and Customer Solutions
Profound Logic Software
http://www.profoundlogic.com
937-439-7925 Phone
877-224-7768 Toll Free
  

The IBM i Modernization Experts
www.profoundlogic.com
      

UPCOMING WEBINAR
Make Modern Apps You’ll Love with Profound UI & Profound.js
Learn how to deliver beautiful business applications using RPG and Node.js.
REGISTER NOW ✎


-----Original Message-----
From: WEB400 <web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Kelly Cookson
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 9:47 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] [EXTERNAL] Re: Problem with iToolkit in Node on Windows

According the 2018 IBM i Marketplace Survey by HelpSystems, slightly over 68% of IBM i shops also run windows.

We value our IBM i as a reliable and cost-efficient back end server. And we value the investments we have made in COBOL. We're not leaving the IBM i in the foreseeable future. But we're equally committed to and invested in Microsoft platforms (windows, SQL Server, IIS, .NET apps).

So, yeah, we would like Node running *anywhere* to have easy access to our IBM i resources.

Thanks,

Kelly Cookson
IT Project Leader
Dot Foods, Inc.
217-773-4486 ext. 12676
www.dotfoods.com<http://www.dotfoods.com>

From: WEB400 [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Andelin
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 8:53 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [WEB400] Problem with iToolkit in Node on Windows

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 7:09 AM, Richard Schoen < Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

I don't know that IBM has had bad issues with Java.


On the whole nobody has suggested otherwise.

The discussion was about IBM facilitating access to IBM i databases and programs from Windows applications. After years of facilitating that, maybe IBM found that it didn't pay. Maybe IBM realized that they were facilitating the deployment of applications that run on Windows, and that shops were migrating workloads to Windows. Maybe IBM would rather that people deploy applications on IBM platforms.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400<https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/web400<https://archive.midrange.com/web400>.
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.