Re: No subject given

["Rindi Wheeler" <Rindi.Wheeler@xxxxxxxx>]

We've tested 6.0.04 client/server and didn't find any Y2K problems.

>>> <jonathan.starks@eu.reckitt.com> 08/11 6:57 AM >>>
     I understand that there has been some discussion on the subject
of Y2k 
     testing of BPCS 6.0.02 and 6.0.04. I am an independant BPCS
consultant 
     with 11 years uninterrupted BPCS experience. Last year I project

     managed the Y2K testing programme on 6.0.02 PLF for the European

     division of a global drinks organisation and am currently
retained as 
     project manager for Y2K testing on 6.0.04 for a global
pharmaceutical 
     and household goods company. 
     
     I would be interested to hear about other users' approach /
experience 
     particularly with 6.0.04.
     
     Regards,
     Jon Starks
     
     jonathan.starks@eu-reckitt.com 

+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com 
+---
+---
| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com
+---