|
-----Original Message----- From: jonathan.starks@eu.reckitt.com <jonathan.starks@eu.reckitt.com> To: bpcs-l@midrange.com <bpcs-l@midrange.com> Date: 11 August 1999 12:47 Subject: No subject given > I understand that there has been some discussion on the subject of Y2k > testing of BPCS 6.0.02 and 6.0.04. I am an independant BPCS consultant > with 11 years uninterrupted BPCS experience. Last year I project > managed the Y2K testing programme on 6.0.02 PLF for the European > division of a global drinks organisation and am currently retained as > project manager for Y2K testing on 6.0.04 for a global pharmaceutical > and household goods company. > > I would be interested to hear about other users' approach / experience > particularly with 6.0.04. > > Regards, > Jon Starks > > jonathan.starks@eu-reckitt.com > >+--- >| This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! >| To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. >| To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. >| To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. >| Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com >+--- > > +--- | This is the BPCS Users Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to BPCS-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to BPCS-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to BPCS-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner: dasmussen@aol.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.