send_file() -- C400-L

Subject: [C400-L] send_file()
From: Gene_Gaunt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:25:48 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/c400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: C programming iSeries / AS400 <c400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:c400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/c400-l>,<mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/c400-l>,<mailto:c400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Is errno 3455 "broken pipe" during a call to send_file() API considered a
signal interrupt?

The notes for send_file() read,

"As the data is sent, the API will update the variables in the sf_parms
structure so that if the send_file() API is interrupted by a signal, the
application simply needs to reissue the send_file() call using the same
parameters."

Does this mean we can restart send_file() after a 3455 "broken pipe"?
(We're sending to an FTP data port over PPP.)

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.