RE: INDARA, SI, and INDIC keyword -- COBOL400-L

Subject: RE: INDARA, SI, and INDIC keyword
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:47:46 -0600
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/cobol400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: COBOL Programming on the iSeries/AS400 <cobol400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:cobol400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l>,<mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cobol400-l>,<mailto:cobol400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> From: Joe Pluta
>
> Okay, I'm still hip with this.  However, my guess is that if you don't
> specify an INDIC clause on an I/O statement, that no indicators will be
> used.  Is this true?
>
> READ WRKSTN INTO MYRECORD-I
> (IN99 will not get set anywhere)
>
> READ WRKSTN INTO MYRECORD-I USING MYRECORD-I-INDIC.
> (IN99 will get set in MYRECORD-I-INDIC)
>
> READ WRKSTN INTO MYRECORD-I USING SOMEOTHER-INDIC.
> (IN99 will get set in SOMEOTHER-INDIC)

In the last two, the phrase should be INDICATORS, not USING.  D'oh.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: INDARA, SI, and INDIC keyword , Jon Paris

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.