Re: COBOL 101

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Jon Paris
>
>  "In answer to your question I think the linkage gets passed in as a big
> blob and you can break down the parms into a data structure."
>
> Which is also true for RPG - so I thought I'd clarify this for the
> archives.
>
> COBOL parm passing is _exactly_ the same as for RPG (or indeed any other
> language on the box).  Of course the syntax is different but the mechanics
> are identical.
>
> For *PGM calls a pointer is passed for each parm.
>
> For procedure calls the parms are passed on the stack (mostly) and will be
> either a pointer (for reference parms) or the actual data for Value parms.
>
> RPG maps parms to data via the *Entry PLIST or the Procedure Interface.
>
> COBOL maps parms to data via the LINKAGE SECTION.
>
> That's all there is to it.

I think, though, the question surrounds the issue of multiple parms, Jon.  I
THINK Richard is implying that three 10-character parameters are passed as
one contiguous 30-character blob.  

This may well be the case if all parameters are passed by value, but when
you pass things by reference you can't pass separate parameters as one data
structure unless you do a bunch of moves into the data structure prior to
the call and a bunch of moves out after the call.

The question is whether my three parameters are always contiguous.  I could
test that out, I guess, by writing an RPG program with three specifically
discontinuous fields and then passing those three to the COBOL program to
see if "mashing" occurs.

Joe