Logical size versus Physical size. -- DOMINO400

Subject: Logical size versus Physical size.
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:35:13 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/domino400>
List-help: <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Lotus Domino on the iSeries / AS400 <domino400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:domino400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/domino400>, <mailto:domino400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

After running
load compact -c -daos on -ZU -n -v
and you notice that one nsf from an engineer who was fond of large
attachments has a logical size of 16,425,677,868 and a physical size of a
paltry 1,181,220,864, is it safe to assume that the rest of that got
shoved off into the DAOS directory?

Oh, he has a cluster replica on an old 8.0.2 server with no daos where the
logical and physical size match at 18,816,696,320.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Logical size versus Physical size. , Chris Whisonant

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.