|
Gary, >Boy, you guys sure know how to kill a product's market! That's certainly not my intent. But caveat emptor always applies, or the IT menager isn't doing his job, IMHO. The legal exposures I see here mostly relate to Tiger and/or the developer. For the IT manager, the issues are different. And if you box isn't already undersized for the workload, then CFINTxx is a non-issue isn't it? Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but if your interactive workload is below the CFINTxx threshold for your box, aren't interactive jobs already running at "full speed" and unthrotled? So in a properly sized box, would "tuning" the jobs to set off the 5250 flag really have any effect if CFINTxx is not running? Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.