Correct, Doug, but any method of repealing the interactive tax, be it
Fast400's "flip off IBM's bit" method, or my method of actually
re-engineering programs to remove the 5250 I/O, helps you during your normal
hardware upgrade cycle.  You can either choose a smaller box and use the
money elsewhere, or use the money you save on the interactive feature to buy
more a machine with more overall CPW.

Also, note that by staying in the 35CPW and under range, you are generally
in a smaller processor tier, thereby reducing your software costs as well.
This is how we market Envoy/PSC400: the product pays for itself, while at
the same time giving you web access to your applications.

Joe Pluta
www.plutabrothers.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Douglas Handy
>
> Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but if your interactive
> workload is below the
> CFINTxx threshold for your box, aren't interactive jobs already
> running at "full
> speed" and unthrotled?  So in a properly sized box, would
> "tuning" the jobs to
> set off the 5250 flag really have any effect if CFINTxx is not running?



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.