|
Correct, Doug, but any method of repealing the interactive tax, be it Fast400's "flip off IBM's bit" method, or my method of actually re-engineering programs to remove the 5250 I/O, helps you during your normal hardware upgrade cycle. You can either choose a smaller box and use the money elsewhere, or use the money you save on the interactive feature to buy more a machine with more overall CPW. Also, note that by staying in the 35CPW and under range, you are generally in a smaller processor tier, thereby reducing your software costs as well. This is how we market Envoy/PSC400: the product pays for itself, while at the same time giving you web access to your applications. Joe Pluta www.plutabrothers.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Handy > > Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but if your interactive > workload is below the > CFINTxx threshold for your box, aren't interactive jobs already > running at "full > speed" and unthrotled? So in a properly sized box, would > "tuning" the jobs to > set off the 5250 flag really have any effect if CFINTxx is not running?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.