Re: RISC to CISC ? and TCP/IP ?

[PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kirk Goins wrote (in part):

>1. I have a client that will be migrating to a 510 from an E70 soon. I'm
>not doing the migrate, but a question came up I want to make sure of.
>The client was questioning a vendor about observability of thier
>code(it's not). The answer from the vendor was something to the effect
>of THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM ANYMORE. Best I can tell it must have
>observability to migrate. If they supply new code in RISC format then we
>don't care. Right ?


Right.  We're upgrading, too.  Although most of our Packaged Applications
have unobservable code, we're talking to the vendors to get a 'shrink
wrapped' copy of their RISC version, which is also unobservable, but was
compiled on a RISC machine and should do the trick.


--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com".
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MAJORDOMO@midrange.com
|    and specify 'unsubscribe MIDRANGE-L' in the body of your message.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---