|
Jack, There are a few things you should think about. The first is make sure you shut off all TCP/IP services on your /400 that you have not thought about and are not using. Eg: Telnet, FTP, HTTP, SMTP, etc. Then when you have put some thought into what the ramifications are of those services and you need them, turn them back on. For example, if you are not ready for Telnet, turn it off. As for Telnet. Keep in mind that you are providing a Signon Screen to the World. If you profile/password security can withstand that, by all means go for it. BUT, make sure ALL "default" profiles are either disabled or at least have new passwords. And make sure that you have adequate passwords for your users. Most (but not all) AS/400's can NOT pass this test. Make sure yours can. Note: If you are using CAWin over TCP/IP, you already have Telnet on....BE CAREFULL about putting your network on the Internet! FTP can actualy be as bad as Telnet. Especially if you create everything with PUBAUT(*ALL) or *USE. The only thing between your data and somebody with the desire is your object level security. At least until you make some changes in the Telnet setup. Yes, both of these (Telnet & FTP) can be safely done. But, you must examine your situation first. Do you need a firewall? That depends. The true purpose of a firewall is to give you a single point of control over security between the Internet and your lan. If you visit each system on your network (Each PC and each AS/400, each Unix box, etc) and make sure they aren't running any TCP/IP services that your deem dangerous and you know nobody but you will start such a service, then you do not need a firewall. But if you want to have telnet on for your network, but NOT the internet (or any TCP/IP service), you will need a firewall. For the most part, most end-user Client Windows machines are Ok. If they are using NETBEUI for network shares (And TCP/IP is not bound to network functions). The only machines you usually have to worry about are your "servers". Eg: SQL Servers using TCP/IP, WinNT Server's with all of MS's cool new internet services, your AS/400's and any UNIX/AIX box's on your network. The AS/400 CAN be a very secure machine. Unfortunately, out of the box it is very open to attack. I will say that "out of the box", Windows NT is much more secure than the AS/400 in terms of TCP/IP services. By this I mean that the defaults are much safer. And I am not saying that either OS is "more secure", just that out of the box, WinNT is better. What is a good firewall? Raptor/NT has a very good reputation and can be setup for less than $10,000 (hardware & Software). IBM's Secured Network Gateway for AIX is very good, but expensive: $25,000 hardware & software. I've used SNG/Aix and really liked it. The firewall for the AS/400 from IBM is actually a partial port of SNG/Aix and is currently quite limited (IMHO)...in a year or two, it might be a very good choice, but for now it is "less than impressive". And at least one of the ISDN routers has a firewall built in! It is probably a very simple one, but inexpensive. Hopefully, the above is enough to get you started and thinking! Regards, Bob Crothers Cornerstone Communications -----Original Message----- From: Jack Mullins [SMTP:jmullins@sundash.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 8:34 AM To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com Subject: Internet security and the AS/400 Hello Everybody, I know there has been some discussion of this in the past. However, I would appreciate it if I could trouble you again with a few questions. I am setting up a dedicated connection to the internet at my office via ISDN. I'm going to route the internet connection directly onto my ethernet so that everyone on the ethernet will have access to the internet. However, I want to protect my AS/400 which is also connected to the ethernet. Also, I am planning to eventually use the AS/400 as an e-mail server and possibly HTML server in the future. I am presently considering buying a fiewall to protect the entire ethernet. What other considerations do I need to entertain and will a firewall be enough? How safe will it be to allow telnet/ftp access to my home users (the only users will probably be MIS for now)? I could use suggestions on firewall brands too. What kind of experiences have you had, good or bad? Thank you, Jack Mullins Sun Industries, Inc. 2409 Industrial Dr. Jonesboro, AR 72401 http://www.sundash.com +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +--- uucp +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.