|
on 01/06/98at 09:58 AM, our friend Dan Swartz <dswartz@courts.state.pa.us> said: >We're embarking on some database design issues and I wanted to know how >others felt about the use of date type fields versus just numeric type >fields (format would be CCYYMMDD). Take some time and try out the L-date field. It has some verrry nice features and i'd bet nickles to cupcakes that more features are already on the drawing boards. There are drawbacks (mainly, imho, that the L-date field can not be an invalid date. For example, a future-due date can not be blank, zeros, or null.) But do some messing around with it - I'm getting used to it and I like it. ---------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin --------------------------------------------------- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to "MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com". | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.