RE: Date * 10000.01

[Tim McCarthy <TimM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Neither. Simple move statements will always require fewer cycles than
math. Too many programmers live in the belief that fewer code statements
result in better and faster code. Often the more mundane and less
"clever" methods are both faster for machines to process and easier to
maintain. 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Berendt [SMTP:rob@dekko.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 1998 3:25 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: Date * 10000.01
> 
> > I strongly agree with Hans.  We did specific performance testing on
> this
> > function in RPG III, and found it to be 48 times more expensive from
> a CPU
> > perspective.
> >
> > Al
> 
> Does this mean that 400 has some extremely weak mathematical
> processing, or 
> is it just the compiler that is badly written?
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
> MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
> david@midrange.com
> +---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---