Re: Batch Job(s)

["Eric DeLong"<eric.delong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

     I would assume B to be the more efficient approach. I believe there 
     would be less overhead with 1 subsystem managing 1 memory pool, but 
     I can't confirm my suspicions...
     
     eric.delong@pmsi-services.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Batch Job(s) 
Author:  <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > at INET_WACO
Date:    12/3/98 2:36 PM


Which would be more efficient A or B?
A - 3 "batch" subsystems using a shared memory pool. Each SBSD with one JOBQ.

B - 1 "batch" subsystem with 3 JOBQs associated with it using same shared
memory pool.

Both scenarios would have MAXACT set to 1 for each JOBQ.



- Doug Barnes -
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---