Re: Batch Job(s)

[jim_oberholtzer@xxxxxxx]

     There should not be any difference at all.  The only part that could 
     be a small difference is the overhead to run the extra subsystems.  
     Depending on your requirements, it might be easier to run the separate 
     subsystems if you need to turn them on and off.  Its easier to see if 
     a subsystem is running that check to see if a job queue is held.
     
     Jim Oberholtzer
     Information Builders
     jim_oberholtzer@ibi.com
     630/971-6700


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Batch Job(s) 
Author:  <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> at Tcpgate
Date:    12/3/98 2:36 PM


Which would be more efficient A or B?
A - 3 "batch" subsystems using a shared memory pool. Each SBSD with one JOBQ.
     
B - 1 "batch" subsystem with 3 JOBQs associated with it using same shared 
memory pool.
     
Both scenarios would have MAXACT set to 1 for each JOBQ.
     
     
     
- Doug Barnes -
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. 
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. 
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com 
+---
     

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---