Re: SNADS over TCP/IP

[Dave Shaw <dshaw1@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter H O'Connor <PHOC@compuserve.com>


>Many companies are dropping SNA or plan to drop SNA and switch over to
>TCP/IP.  However, this leaves them without SNADS.
>
>My question, is there any interest in being about to use SNADS like
>functions over TCP/IP?  You could do such things as SNDNETF and SNDNETMSG.
>You could receive the file just like you currently do on an SNA network.
>
>Basically, you would have the ability of SNADSing anyone with an IP
>address.
>
>I would appreciate any comments on the subject.

What would be the advantage of this hypothetical function over just using
Anynet to run SNADS over TCP/IP?

---
Dave Shaw, General Nutrition, Greenville, SC (just down the road from BMW -
Bubba Makes Wheels :)
The opinions expressed may not be my employer's unless I'm sufficiently
persuasive...



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---