RE: Mcsec in Timestamp, is it possible?

[Dimitri Efimov <defimov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks,

but I can get timestamp, the point is how make the system to fullfil ALL 6
digits of milliseconds? Now I get itn like: MMM000 (milliseconds are ok, but
MICROSECONDS are in zero)

Dmitri


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Buck Calabro [mailto:buck.calabro@aptissoftware.com]
Enviado el: martes, 13 de febrero de 2001 12:57
Para: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Asunto: RE: Mcsec in Timestamp, is it possible


Scott Klement posted an example a while ago.  You can find it in the
archives:
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/200101/msg00867.html

Buck Calabro
Aptis; Albany, NY
"Nothing is so firmly believed as
 that which we least know" -- Michel Montaigne
Visit the Midrange archives at http://www.midrange.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dimitri Efimov 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 11:51 AM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Mcsec in Timestamp, is it possible
> 
> We have got some process runnig less than 1 msec (840 with 24 CPU). Sound
> greate, but I have to know how match time it takes to finish the process.
> As
> I can see in journal, that system can manage microseconds, therefore why
> when I use 
> 
>  C                   TIME                    timestamp         
> 
> to obtain current time of the system, I allways have 000 as microseconds. 
> 
> Do somebody have an experiece to obtain time with microseconds including?
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Dmitri
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---