RE: Performance of SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail

[Joel Fritz <JFritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd be real interested to hear if anyone's achieved that kind of throughput
on the 400, and how.  We'd love to dump the package we're using that runs on
another platform.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: M Jull [mailto:fcsltd@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 10:04 AM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject: Performance of SNDDST vs QtmmSendMail
> 
> 
> At my current job there are emails that need to be sent to 
> the internet from 
> CL and RPG programs (mostly CL's right now) and these emails 
> can have a 
> frequency of 30,000 per hour (sometimes more).  Which method 
> of sending will 
> be quicker (less overhead on the AS/400) - SNDDST or 
> QtmmSendMail?  Some of 
> the emails are custom written and some are system generated 'Generic' 
> letters.
> 
> Currently this is being (mis)handled by SNDNETSPLF 
> commands....which causes 
> the 720 to slow down considerably.  None of the emails are 
> MIME format - 
> they are just TXT files kept in a folder.  This may be a 
> future requirement 
> (to use MIME or html docs) however.
> 
> Thanks for any and all advice.
> 
> Marilyn Jull
> Alcas Corp.
> ______________________________________________________________
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---