RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)

[Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I wonder why IBM didn't add an additional parameter to the 
>RTVJOBA command call LUSRLIBL (long user *LIBL). 
>That way no existing code needed changing, and forced 
>you to modify the program only if you needed the additional
>libraries. Just like any other enhancement should work.

All of the old CL's (still using USRLIBL instead of the new parameter) are
broken because they will lose library 26+.  I really can't see how IBM could
make this change without breaking code.

Buck 

"Love truth but pardon error"
  -- Voltaire
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---