RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)

[Jim Langston <jimlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If this is, indeed, the way V5R1 works, that if you don't use more than
25 libraries everything works exactly the same as it did in older versions,
the I believe that IBM did the right thing.  This is the way I would expect
an upgrade of this nature to happen.

That way, if you don't use the new feature, more than 25 libraries in your
library list, you don't have to change a single thing.

But, if you decide to use this new feature, then you have to fix your code.

This is good, IMO, and if this is the way it works, Kudos to IBM!

Regards,

Jim Langston

Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:09:43 -0500
From: "Leland, David" <dleland@Harter.com>
Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was  V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0E87B.4CB67020
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"

So, what you're saying is that if you changed the user portion of your
library list to have more than 25 libraries in it, you'd be satisfied to
have an existing program only retrieve the first 25 using the RTVJOBA
command?  All for the sake of not having to recompile your CL program?
Sheesh.  Think of the mess that could cause?

As I mentioned before, you only need to fix your CL programs if you start
using more than 25 libraries in your library list.

Dave
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---