|
Nathan, The performance of a non-Domino workload on a Bumblebee is not really a technical issue, despite the similarities in workload. IBM has tweaked the system to allow work originating within Domino to utilize the entire processor while other work will tank the system if it exceeds a certain per cent of processor capacity. I have tried to run non-Domino workloads on a Bumblebee and buried the system rather quickly. The URL below points to an IBM white paper which describes some of the characteristics of jobs which will perform well on the Bumblebee. Your CGI programs may be allowed but the only way to be assured of this would be a benchmark on an actual system. http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/domino/pdf/dsdworkloads.pdf The Bumblebee systems were not introduced because of the poor performance on traditional systems. They have taken the more powerful systems, given them a lower price, and called them a Dedicated Server for Domino. This allows IBM to compete with the Microsoft/Intel platform in the Domino arena. The tweaking is necessary so that you don't use the system outside of the arena in which IBM wants to compete. This is really a marketing thing and provides excellent value for Domino/AS400 users. In a way, this is the same issue as the Server vs. 5250 performance values and their respective prices. My opinion anyway, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse IBM Specialist - Domino R5 for AS/400 IBM Solutions Expert - iSeries 400 Technology > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com] > On Behalf Of Nathan M. Andelin > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 11:23 AM > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > Subject: Re: Subject: cgi on a Bumblebee > > Jim, > > This is something I have wished I knew, but never took the opportunity to > ask. I've thought about it a lot. But it would be great if someone were > able to share their experience of running non-Domino, batch programs - > like > CGI on a Bumblebee server. I've read that the Bumblebee servers were > introduced in response to the poor performance of Domino on traditional > systems. And there are a lot of similarities between Domino and Web > applications. So why wouldn't Web applications run great on a Domino box? > > Domino and Web applications are more CPU intensive than 5250. The > Bumblebee > server you asked about (270-2422) has a 400 Mhz Pulsar CPU. Not too long > ago, Joe Pluta and I compared the performance of his 270-2250 to my 170- > 2290 > at running a CPU intensive benchmark. His box ran the program 17 times > faster than mine. His system apparently has the same 400 Mhz Pulsar CPU > in > the Bumblebee 270-2422 you referred to, so it would perplex me if the > Bumblebee server didn't provide high performance for CGI. > > But I don't know. Can you run a test? > > Thanks, > > Nathan. > > > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:49:24 -0400 > > From: "Jim Franz" <franz400@triad.rr.com> > > Subject: cgi on a Bumblebee > > > > Can a Bumblebee server (270-2422) be used for rpg/cgi? > > Have a site with this 270 for email (200 users) and a separate > > older system. They would like a small e-commerce site, hoping > > not to upgrade the older application box. I have reservation about=20 > > a 50 cpw bumblebee running rpg/cgi. Can it? > > jim franz > > > +--- > | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! > | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. > | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. > | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L- > UNSUB@midrange.com. > | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: > david@midrange.com > +--- +--- | This is the Midrange System Mailing List! | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. | To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com +---
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.