|
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com> > I personally prefer to use a message-based design > where I have designed the protocol and nobody on the > outside is likely to be able to hack it Joe, I generally agree with you that being in control of the interface is a good thing, but I would disagree with your "security by obscurity" argument. True, if you use a proprietary protocol, that the 'script kiddies' are left out in the cold, but if your system is worthy of attack, the bad guys will get you anyway.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
