From: Steve Richter <srichter@AutoCoder.com>
> From: Leif Svalgaard <leif@leif.org>
> >Ah, but if the experience of open software is any guide: those bugs would
> be found and fixed by the community, not by IBM, so there would be no
expense
> >on part of IBM.

> I think you still need one entity in charge of the system.

I agree, and in case of Linux, Linus still serves that function,
but in terms of finding the bugs, it doesn't matter who owns it.

I can imagine a world (not to come to pass though) where
IBM or a BP or a customer would propose a change, maybe
even produce some code. The change and the code would
be reviewed by the community, the bugs would be flushed
out, improvements would be suggested, etc, and the platform
would move forward as IBM takes advantage of the talent
and requirements of the community. It will not happen
because IBM think that the community is too dumb.

.






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.