RE: Telnet Server

[Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You would connect to port 23 not bind to it.  At that point you are acting
as a client, not a server.  IBM's telnet server is bound to port 23 waiting
for your connection.


Christopher K. Bipes      mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Operations & Network Mgr  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.                  http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive     Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928    Fax: 707 586-1884

-----Original Message-----
From: Shannon O'Donnell [mailto:orion@auburnctnet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 8:19 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Telnet Server



----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Klement" <klemscot@klements.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: Telnet Server


So...would I need to bind port 23 then, or could I simply write to it
without binding it?  Seems to me that I'd get an error if I attempted to
bind on port 23 since it's already being used by the Telnet server.