We are at 4.4, should have put that in the original.  I see an MSF exit
point but don't think that is used for local messages.  I thought of adding
monitoring to the receiving and having the monitor automatically add each
sender to this person, but that would add the whole system in a day and I do
not want to do that.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Christopher K. Bipes      mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Operations & Network Mgr  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.                  http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive     Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928    Fax: 707 586-1884

-----Original Message-----
From: John Earl [mailto:johnearl@powertechgroup.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 10:08 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Monitoring messaging


For the SNDMSG you could use the (V4R5 and later) command exits.  They
work on any command.   For QEZSNDMG... much tougher,  I think.  You
can audit object use, but that won't give you the text of the message.
You could write a command exit for the "CALL" command and filter only
the program QEZSNDMG, but I would be concerned about wider system
impacts.

Another thought - The receiving part will give you the sending part.
Part of each message is who sent it.  Is that enough?

jte


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.