At 9/11/2001 11:01 AM -0500, you wrote:
>There were reports that Usama bin Ladin made threats roughly three weeks ago
>to attack the U.S. on an unprecendented scale (words to that effect), and it
>seem he's done just that.  What possible good can this do to the political
>groups behind it?  What can it do for his cause, whatever it may be?  This
>made damned sure that world sentiment is solidly against them, while at the
>same time it has given the U.S. all but carte blanche to do to bin Ladin
>whatever they deem necessary.  I think that at this point, the U.S. would
>probably be able to employ tactical nuclear weapons without fear of serious
>international condemnation.

Please don't spread this toxic hateful nonsense. Tactical nuclear weapons?
What will that solve? What will it prove? We're the only nation on earth to
use nuclear weapons in war, and it didn't deter THIS attack, so what will
using them AGAIN do?

  ... Chuck



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.