Re: DB2/400 comparisons with other relational databases (specificallyOracle and SQL Server) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: DB2/400 comparisons with other relational databases (specificallyOracle and SQL Server)
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:16:16 -0600 (MDT)
List-Archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-Help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-Id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-Post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Server Dave wrote:

> Mandy,
> As a general rule from now on I would only recomend SQL2000 Enterprise for
> any new
> applications-It beats Oracle hands down,has all the bells and whistles
> management tools/dev enviroment  that Oracle has not got yet.
> Its aboubt as good as DB2/400 but is far cheaper and scales nicely at a
> fraction of the cost.

So I assume you won the million dollar prize from Oracle for showing that
SQL Server is more than 1/10th the speed of Oracle?

James Rich
james@eaerich.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: DB2/400 comparisons with other relational databases (specifically Oracle and SQL Server) , Server Dave

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.