|
One thing springs to mind here-before this thread close's. One advantage for the customer is developer rates for MS VB,SQLSever Developers is low compared to Oracle and Java-hence a software shop can pass this saving on (example in NZ rates are between 40k to 75k (US 16K to 30k) .Oracle is aboubt 30% higher and Java higher still) Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Rich" <james@eaerich.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2001 8:18 AM Subject: Re: DB2/400 comparisons with other relational databases (specifically Oracle and SQL Server) On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Server Dave wrote: > Microsoft Action Pack Subscription-Plus > The Microsoft Action Pack Subscription-Plus is designed for Partners that > not only need the essential, up-to-date sales, marketing, and campaign tools > and resources to get them on track quickly for new Microsoft products, > solutions, and marketing campaigns, but also want to receive core Microsoft > products such as Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Advanced Server, Microsoft SQL > ServerT, 2000, Microsoft Small Business Server 2000, Microsoft Exchange > Server 2000, Microsoft Office XP, Microsoft Visio® 2002, and much more! This seems like a good reason to avoid MS SQL server right there. It seems to be *all* microsoft. What if, and there are lies, d*** lies, and benchmarks, MS Windows doesn't scale well to meet your needs? Or what if MS screws you (win XP comes to mind)? Or what if the monopoly case gets going again and MS is broken up? All your business depends on one vendor and that vendor can have their way with you. An advantage of Oracle is that it runs on several platforms. Don't like Solaris? Run it in linux. Don't like that either? Run it on Win XP. MS screw you with licensing? Run it on S/390 under linux (yes, you can do that now, too). Now you can choose what fits your needs best. The same advantage exists with db2. You can run it on the AS/400, linux, AIX, Windows, etc. The consumer has the power to choose. The vendors cannot as easily screw their customers because the customer can go to someone else. It seems to me that Microsoft's entire business strategy lies in taking power away from customers and making choices for them. I won't stand for it any longer. This combined with Gartner's advice and other technical failures and shortcomings in Microsoft products has resulted in our company's decision to not recommend or support Microsoft products. I apologize to everyone for responding and contributing to a thread which has only a little to do with midrange computing as related to the AS/400. I just couldn't help myself :) James Rich james@eaerich.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.