This is a very OLD discussion that has been rehashed from a
financial stand point by any number of firms. The 400 wins
almost every time after the number of users goes past 10-15...

The biggest thing the economy system builders leave out, is the
number of people required to maintain those "cheap" server farms.

By the time you add up the software costs and throw in a few
"extra" support folks, the 400 leaves the "cheap computer" in
the dirt.... The added space and cooling is just more $$$ piled
on the big stack of requirements.



"Wills, Mike N. (TC)" wrote:

For the price of an AS400, a cluster of Linux servers could be
built that would be just as reliable, and possibly even faster in
processing
power, more disk space, and just as secure. Granted, it would take up
much
more space and need more cooling.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.