|
Chris, I use the CPU speed as a point of relational reference. And my guess is that if IBM finds yet another way to "cfint" a processor, that someone like Tiger will find the way around it... jmho... ---------- On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, M. Lazarus wrote: > Chris, > > At 11/9/01 10:29 AM -0800, you wrote: > >See, there is the real problem. The people are stupid enough to measure > >computing performance by processor speed. But then, if they bought their > >1.7GHz processors and they wanted to use all the 1.7GHz, I sure understand. > >But how much would they complain if they bought their 1.7GHz processors and > >Intel shipped 3.4GHz chips hobbled down to 1.7GHz? They bought 1.7GHz and > >they got 1.7GHz, does it matter what the vendor did to provide it? > > Does Intel claim that overclocking is illegal? Warranty issues aside, I > would say no. We are sold something w/ a minimum guaranteed speed. If we > find a way to increase that capacity, that is our own business. > > -mark > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.