RE: Reply quoted

["jt" <jt@xxxxxx>]

Richard,

I assumed I was being flamed, so responded.  But your points are well-taken.
Hope you saw my points, as well.

*INLR = *ON
RETURN

(Speaking for myself, only.)

jt

| -----Original Message-----
| From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
| [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Richard Reeve
| Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 8:38 AM
| To: midrange-l@midrange.com
| Subject: RE: Reply quoted
|
|
| --
| [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
|
|  If useful, meaningful (and helpful) content is the point of this
| forum, it would appear that those that choose to banter about
| meaningless content and then complain about the same are just as
| guilty as those that they are complaining about.  I find this
| site extremely useful and am more than willing to sift through
| the BS from time to time.  Arguing about this is only increasing
| the number of non-productive posts.
| Might we give it a break?