RE: 18 CPW? (was RE: V5R1M0 and you...)

["jt" <jt@xxxxxx>]

I just thought how I should have phrased this question:

"Ya know, my former employer upgraded their machine a couple years ago, due
to extra processing for 400 to *nix conversion.  They were a $500M company
running on a F70 (CPW around 60)."

"Prior to that, they had some Exx with CPW of 20...  So I know you can do a
lot with just a few CPW...!  (User's thought they were in 'hawg heaven'
after the upgrade..."

"But...  I was just curious"...

jt

| -----Original Message-----
| From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
| [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Pat Barber
| Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:42 PM
| To: midrange-l@midrange.com
| Subject: Re: 18 CPW? (was RE: V5R1M0 and you...)
|
|
| They are "many" 18cpw or less installed and you would be surprised
| at what they are capable of doing. I suspect the lower end 170's
| far outnumber almost all other machines.
|
| A 9402-400(first risc) is perfectly capable of running 50 terminals,
| 2-3 remote sites and any number of printers without breaking a major
| sweat.
|
| I know that "more" is better, but not always. I have several customers
| with "lower end" machines that do just fine.....
|
|
| jt wrote:
|
| > Was this a typo...?!?
| >
| > If not, what model machine is that?  I don't know how to say
| this without
| > sounding insulting...:  But what do you use this box for.
| >