|
>But if everyone used the same field names and PREFIX or QUALIFIED then the >system file QADBIFLD would be terrific. >Also, a SQL UDT would be a better substitute for a field reference file. >But if you >never use sql< then I can understand the grounding for your >beliefs. >Rob Berendt I don't think UDT's are a exact replacement for the Refer process. I can Refer to a field and change any attribute I want on the new field. and many other things that UDT's do not provide. If you still have to use Printer Files or Display files you can't just do a REF(xxx) with UDT's John Carr
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
