RE: Compiling from IFS versus DSPPGM -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Compiling from IFS versus DSPPGM
From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:19:51 -0400
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Count me in to join party, although no time to fill out form...!! :-)


| -----Original Message-----
| [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of rob@dekko.com
| Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:35 PM

| IBM has acknowledged the limitations of DSPPGM, DSPMOD, DSPSRVPGM,
| QBNLPGMI, etc in supporting source from IFS.  I was told that it is not a
| bug, but a nonfeature.

| Anyone else want to join the party?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.