RE: system save

["Andy Nolen-Parkhouse" <aparkhouse@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure why you would want to automate a "load next tape" message
reply.  If you don't have an automatic tape advance, you certainly don't
want to reply until the next tape is loaded.  Taking the cancel option
seems kind of self-defeating.

Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

> On Behalf Of jt
> Subject: RE: system save
>
> That could be the case, now.
>
> Back when We had to throw together a hack to do fully-unattended
backups
> (in
> '92), the "next tape" messages weren't handled by the SYSRPYL.
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Steve Landess
> |
> | If the message is an Inquiry message (one requiring a reply), I'm
pretty
> | sure that you can answer it with a reply list entry...the only thing
you
> | have to do is make sure that the job in question is using
> | INQMSGRPY(*SYSRPYL)...
> | Steve