Hmmm...  aren't all databases (relational or 
not) really tablespaces with an access method?  

I would consider DB2/400 relational.

What is the difference between an iSeries/400 
logical file and an Oracle index?  Or an Oracle 
view?  I would say none, except for 
complications on the Oracle side to keep 
everything set up for easy backup and recovery.

As long as the iSeries maintains its object-
based roots, the actual implementation of the 
database is moot.  Don't you agree? 

William

---- Begin Original Message ----
date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:43:08 -0600
 from: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: DB2

From: Andy Nolen-Parkhouse <aparkhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
> The relational database has been part of the 
OS/400 operating system
> since day one (1988). ?Before that it was part 
of CPF on the S/38. ?

It was not relational at the time and still 
isn't. The relational stuff is built on top of a 
basic ISAM-type database allowing split-key 
alternate indices (A.K.A. logical files).




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.