Re: 64bit Windws 2003 Server

["Paul Nelson" <pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I got the impression from him a year ago that it might be sooner than that.
He said that IBM was ready to go, but M$ was a year behind schedule.

Paul Nelson
Arbor Solutions, Inc.
708-670-6978 Cell
708-923-7354 Home
pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ingvaldson, Scott" <SIngvaldson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 11:27 AM
Subject: RE: 64bit Windws 2003 Server


> Well then, start the countdown.  Last time I saw Frank Soltis speak, he
said
> that 18 months after 64 bit Windows was available on Intel it would be
able
> to run in an iSeries LPAR.
>
> Scott Ingvaldson
> AS/400 System Administrator
> GuideOne Insurance Group
>
> -----Original Message-----
> date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 21:47:54 +1200
> from: "David Bulog" <d2ba@xxxxxxxxxx>
> subject: 64bit Windws 2003 Server + SQL server
>
> Well they have finally done it, Windows Server 2003 and SQL server is
> 64bit on the Intel Itanium platform.
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/features/highlights.ms
> px#64bit
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/64bit/overview.asp
>
> That's a huge step in the right direction for MS and one step closer to
> the mighty AS/400 platform.
> Any thoughts, comments?
>
> Cheers Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>