Apache is not GPL (Re: Did IBM Hijack Apache???? )

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There is no requirement to redistribute your changes. The only thing is, 
either the source or accompanying documentation, "must retain the above 
copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer"

I don't think I left anything out, so check out 
<http://www.apache.org/license.txt>, instead of all this speculation.

No changes must be open source, if I read things correctly.

Regards

Vern

At 01:16 PM 4/28/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> Yes, they would have to be under the rules of the GPL.  Well, they could
> change them for their own internal use, but if the distributed, they would
> have to release the code.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 2:16 PM
> Subject: RE: Did IBM Hijack Apache????
>
>
> > are all of the ibm changes open source?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Steve
> >