Re: overriding IBM's options on PDM

[craigs@xxxxxxxxx]

I have already created my own PDM option for compiles "M" for compile ("C"
is call).  "14" is left as is.  This accepts library, file, member, and
type.  A CL program is called with all the compile commands defined.  If
SRCTYP='CLP', CRTCLPGM...., etc.  Target release, debug view, etc are
defined once so you should normally never have to prompt the "14" to
override things like target release and debug view.  Actually, target
release is kept in a data area.  All compile commands are prompted but you
shouldn't have to override normally.  The reason for doing this is to allow
the program to be submitted from a command line as a command and prompted.
Just type COMPILE and press F4 and fill in your library, member, compile in
batch, etc.  Okay, maybe you wouldn't want to compile straight from a
command line but this would take care of selecting the command based on
source type.  I can share this program if you wish.  Good luck!

Craig

** Vern wrote:
Right, Rick, and this goes with what others have said. But I was thinking,
in response to this, that the individual commands could be modified - the
ones he needs, and then PDM would call them instead. Messy, as you say, but
doable, I think. It's no different, is it, from putting copies above the
shipped commands with different defaults?

Vern

At 05:04 PM 10/9/2003 -0500, you wrote:

Vern,

at first, I was thinking he could do something like that, up until i
started thinking of all that option 14 does:  crtbndrpg, crtrpgpgm,
crtclpgm, crtpf, crtlf, crtdspf, crt??? depending on member type, the list
goes on and on....

that could get pretty hairy, doncha think?

rick

-----midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----

Put a command above QSYS in the system portion of library list, same name
as what 14 calls, same parameters? That uses your program?

Was this possible before V5R2? I didn't know about it if it were.

HTH

Vern