|
Thanks, Jim. Walden's a good friend (well, as good a friend as you can have coming from The Dark Side <G>), so I guess I was a little stung, but we're past that now. As to PSC/400, it kicks serious butt. The product is based on my thin-veneer JSP Model II architecture, and it provides sub-second access on a LAN and close to that even over dial up. Yet, unlike most screen scraper solutions, the screens look like they were designed for the web, not simply 5250 pages in a browser. Interestingly, some people want 5250 in a browser (to avoid retraining costs, for example) and for them we have a pure 5250 emulation mode. We're even currently testing it as an alternative to 5250 emulation in handheld devices. Joe > From: JOberholtzer@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > <snip> > I in no way recommend or endorse running unlicensed software, and I'm a > little ticked off that Walden would imply otherwise. > > Joe > </snip> > > Joe, > > Thanks for your clarification. For the record, I read your comment as > advocating Fast/400 like products as well. (made me even look on your web > site to see if you offered anything like that) Your idea about how to move > interactive to batch is an excellent idea, and depending on how it is > architected can be very efficient.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.