|
On the 1 vs. 2 conference/year issue, I don't care. But I will say that there's practically no way I'd ever be able to attend >1 per year. If it would be reduced to just 1/year, I would strongly recommend it take place in the first half of the year as some companies, if they are in danger of making their numbers, slash training for the rest of the year. That could eliminate people from being able to attend a conf in the fall. I've been there; I've had Fall classes cancelled because the training budgets were slashed after mid-year quarterly results. As to city, I would say look to where the highest concentrations of iSeries folks are (really the highest concentration of potential attendees) and try to go there. Hold an annual poll on the COMMON site. One reason I was able to go to the Chicago conf this year was the fact that I had no T&E expenses. Not only is this good for my employer's bottom line, it ups my opportunities for attending more classes/conferences throughout the year. Training budgets aren't unlimited. I'm sure most managers would gladly pay the extra $100 no-hotel-room fee if it meant avoiding $1500 in T&E expenses for the week. Ditto for folks who foot the bill out of their own pocket. Soe will argue they do better when the event is out of town and they're away from their normal distractions, but I'd imagine others would also be glad to be able to see their families, not arrange for extra child care, etc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.