RE: Technical and Philosophy

["Eric Graeb" <egraeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For one, you can't end QCTL to terminate anything your programmers might
have left running by accident.  If it's interactive only I'm not sure if
this is a big deal or not.

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thompson, Glenn
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:17 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Technical and Philosophy

First, thanks for all of the input from everyone.

Secondly, it seems setting up another QINTER type subsystems is a chore.
Maybe one that needs to be done.  However, what caveats are there if I
chose to use QCTL instead?


> Be Ye Forewarned. You will have to explicity define all workstation
> entries to make this work reliably. The Work Management Guide
> specifically states that if more than one subsystem exists in which
your
> worksttion has an AT(*SIGNON) entry then the subsystem which will
> display your signon screen can not be predicted.  In other words leave
> *ALL in QINTER and these entries in your subsystems will not get you
> consistent results.  Just so you know...!
> 
>    - Larry
>