Re: Thin Client Solution for Cheap Skates(frugal customers)

[ChadB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

IGEL's products were a great replacement of the IBM netstations for us.
They are VERY configurable and easy to secure based on profiles.  There is
a great remote management tool for them also.

If you have need of a contact for more information, let me know.


                                                                       
             Pat Barber                                                
             <mboceanside@worl                                         
             dnet.att.net>                                              To
             Sent by:                  Midrange Systems Technical      
             midrange-l-bounce         Discussion                      
             s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>   
                                                                        cc
                                                                       
             04/05/2006 02:10                                      Subject
             PM                        Re: Thin Client Solution for Cheap
                                       Skates(frugal customers)        
                                                                       
             Please respond to                                         
             Midrange Systems                                          
                 Technical                                             
                Discussion                                             
             <midrange-l@midra                                         
                 nge.com>                                            
                                                                       
                                                                       




5250 is what we need. CLI, Bosanova,etc,etc.

My last experience with thin clients was the IBM box,
which was a giant disaster.(NS 1000 several years ago)

They do not want any "surfing" or "email".

I have tried to explain to them that it can be eliminated,
but they are very set on the "no pc" theory.

Seems as though one of the owners read a nasty little article
on how much time and money are wasted on surfing and email
at work.......

I have no preference, and they really do have a point.

It's about a wash on prices between a pc and a thin client
from what I have seen so far.






David Gibbs wrote:


> What kind of terminals?  Are you talking about 5250's, vt100's, X
> stations, what?

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


_____________________________________________________________________________

Scanned by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
For more information please visit http://www.ers.ibm.com
_____________________________________________________________________________


ForwardSourceID:NT000424F2