RE: Slow AS400 performance -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Slow AS400 performance
From: "Jim Damato" <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 15:56:46 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Battery backed cache is common.



I understand that for the next generation cache IBM is partnering on
this technology:

http://makeashorterlink.com/?V25D51DFC

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Colin Williams
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 2:49 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Slow AS400 performance

Am I the only one wondering why an as400 would need batteries?

I can understand the need for them as a backup, or for retaining config
values, but for normal use in hardware?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.