|
On my ancient laptop I use Mochasoft's TN5250 because it doesn't take up as much space or resource as Client Access does. On the desktops I use both SDI's TN3270+ (which includes FTP and LPR clients) as well as Client Access. I prefer the keyboard functionality of TN3270+ over Client Access, but Client Access allows me to apply colour attributes directly into my source which TN3270+ doesn't. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pat Barber Sent: 27 April 2006 16:32 To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Every day emulation What is the general population using for every day emulation these days ? Is Access for Windows still the emulator of choice ? As I recall, most conversations regarding older versions of CA start with the phrase "I hate that software". If it is still hated, what are the other options ?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
