The fundamental problem with data queues is your client 
code does not get a definitive return code from the server. 

While true, sometimes you don't want/need one. One of the great
advantages of DQs is that they can be used for async processing. In that
case, while you do need some way of reporting errors, the logic assumes
that there is no return code since the server job hasn't looked at the
sent request, and may not for a long time.

Another advantage is that you can have several jobs reading from the
same queue (and obviously many jobs sending to it) so if you've got a
resource intensive server process you can start as many jobs as you need
to keep the queue size "reasonable." I know in the past we've done
systems where there was a watcher job whose job it was to start and end
queue reader jobs as needed to ensure the backlog on the queue wasn't
too large.

-Walden


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.