Re: Performance of ODBC vs. other access methods -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Performance of ODBC vs. other access methods
From: Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:41:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Steve Richter wrote:

How much better would RPG be if its arrays
were boundless, the index could be a key value and each entry of the
array could itself contain a boundless array? It would be great, but
it takes a lot of CPU to support such a thing.

-Steve

Ever submit a DCR for this? There's, also, the COMMON Requirementssystem (http://community.common.org/) - you don't even have to be a member.



        * Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i5/iSeries Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
        615.995.7024
fax
        615.995.1201
email
        jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.