|
On 9/6/06, vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Steve - this comment of Richard's is about vendor updates, not persistent and continual maintenance and administration - i fear your comments do not address the point made.
ok, sorry. I still think it is nuts that db2 cant keep track of what indexes should and should not be retained and maintained based on their frequency of use and the time it takes to build them. If the system was not geared down it would have the horsepower needed to perform this task. -Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
