Re: US DST Changes - 2007 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: US DST Changes - 2007
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:49:03 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree with your point on item 2 - they should have fixed the existing 
objects.  However you bring up an interesting point in your earlier email 
about Canada.  I too wondered if there were people in certain timezones 
that were not adopting the modified DST.  Indiana finally gets force fed 
DST and now they want to extend it.  This is going to go well.  I am sure 
that if you can pick whether or not to adopt modified DST the courts in 
Indiana are going to be busy again.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: US DST Changes - 2007 , Al Barsa

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.