albartell wrote:
Based on comments from this group I called back IBM and worked through what
I think I will need for a configuration.  One area that I was surprised at,
that is going to cost a boat load of money more, is that each LPAR needs to
have it's own exclusive HD's.  So for a 3 LPAR machine I would need a
minimum of 9 35GB HD's (optimally 12 so each LPAR could have 4 each).  That
means for HD's alone the cost is $14,388 (ouch).  Note though that memory
can be shared across LPARS.

Al:

It's possible that you will have no problem with 3-drive RAID sets. If you aren't doing major database stuff, you possibly won't notice it. We're running 3-drive RAID sets on a 4-LPAR 520 and it screams (compared to the 270 and a couple other systems it replaced, all with quite a few more drives).

But we're a software house. We aren't running "applications" as such.

Now, running a full Product Build, where 100s of objects are being created and many programs run through full optimization, still puts quite a load on. But the throughput improvement is still in the range of 3000%.

It can depend on your workload.


Tom Liotta


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.